{"table":"findings","corpusVersion":"1.0.0","generatedAt":"2026-07-21T12:00:00Z","demo":false,"license":"CC BY 4.0 — cite AI Tribune (aitribune.org)","count":2,"rows":[{"id":"fnd-001","kind":"contradiction","actorIds":["openai"],"claimIds":["clm-0014","clm-0016","clm-0001"],"askId":"ask-federal-frontier-framework","summary":"May 2023 Senate Judiciary testimony proposes a new federal agency that 'licenses any effort above a certain scale of capabilities and can take that license away' (clm-0014). May 2025 Senate Commerce testimony calls a heavy-handed prior-approval requirement for AI 'disastrous' (clm-0016), and the March 2025 OSTP filing asks for relief from state measures in exchange for a voluntary federal partnership (clm-0001). The documents are compatible only if the 2023 licensing proposal is read as abandoned; none of the later documents says so. All three documents linked; reader decides.","status":"published","date":"2026-07-21","signedOff":true},{"id":"fnd-002","kind":"frame-mismatch","actorIds":["ccia"],"claimIds":["clm-0051"],"askId":"ask-delay-highrisk-2027","summary":"The 19 Nov 2025 statement's frame is legal certainty and 'more realistic timelines'; the ask it advances is a 16-month-plus deferral of binding high-risk obligations plus further loosening (higher systemic-risk compute threshold, narrowed copyright extraterritoriality). Frame tag and ask direction diverge, recorded as a mismatch, not a judgment of either.","status":"published","date":"2026-07-21","signedOff":true}]}