Canonical policy question · Multilateral standards

Should intergovernmental AI principles guide national rules?

Soft-law instruments such as the OECD AI Recommendation supply shared definitions that many jurisdictions then incorporate, revise or ignore.

Current statesettling

Policy asks

Tracked outcomes

Policy vehicles

Where the asks appear

Policy lineage

Events and deadlines
  1. 2024-05-03
    OECD revises the AI Recommendation

    The OECD Council meeting at Ministerial level revised the Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence.

Evidence ledger

Explained source passages

OECD Recommendation defines an AI system for adherents

The revised Recommendation states a shared definition of an AI system used across many national frameworks.

AI system: An AI system is a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.
OECD Legal Instruments · OECD/LEGAL/0449 · Section I definition of AI system

OECD Council revised the AI Recommendation on 3 May 2024

The legal-instrument text records the May 2024 ministerial revision addressing generative AI and related developments.

Recommendation was revised by the OECD Council meeting at Ministerial level on 3 May 2024 to reflect technological and policy developments, including with respect to generative AI, and to further facilitate its implementation.
OECD Legal Instruments · OECD/LEGAL/0449 · introductory history

Intelligence records

Reported developments