AITAI TribunePolicy intelligence
Search everything⌘ K
10 / July / 2025 · EU · Compliance tool

EU publishes a voluntary GPAI Code of Practice for AI Act duties

On 10 July 2025 the Commission announced receipt of the final General-Purpose AI Code of Practice. The code covers transparency and copyright for all GPAI providers and safety/security for systemic-risk models.

What the record establishes

Finding

The European Commission received the final General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on 10 July 2025 as a voluntary compliance tool.

Underlying policy record

2025-07-10 · Update

EU GPAI Code of Practice published

Publication supplied the voluntary compliance tool for AI Act GPAI provider duties ahead of enforcement milestones.

Frontier safety

Should frontier models face mandatory evaluations?

Evaluation language is widespread in policy texts. Thresholds, evaluators and legal consequences remain contested.

guidance · Published

EU General-Purpose AI Code of Practice

Voluntary multi-stakeholder code detailing AI Act duties for providers of general-purpose AI models.

Evidence

Primary record
Direct sourceOpen evidence record

Commission received the final GPAI Code of Practice on 10 July 2025

The Commission announcement records receipt of the final voluntary Code covering transparency, copyright and safety/security chapters.

The European Commission has received the final version of the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, a voluntary tool developed by 13 independent experts, with input from over 1,000 stakeholders, including model providers, small and medium-sized enterprises, academics, AI safety experts, rightsholders, and civil society organisations.
European Commission · Commission announcement · 10 July 2025

Coverage comparison

Source mix for this record
Source-type coverage for this recordShare by source type for this intelligence record. Empty groups stay visible.
Coverage gap

Signatory uptake and post-endorsement practice remain the live dispute after the July 2025 final text.

Method

Coverage is grouped by source type and compared with the primary policy record. Missing source groups remain visible rather than being filled by assumption.