This update belongs to AI-agent implementation opinions. Read the parent policy page for the full instrument.
What changed
FactThe guidance combines development priorities with lifecycle safety, standards, monitoring and governance.
CAC, NDRC and MIIT jointly issued implementation opinions for AI agents.
Operational consequence
AnalysisCreated a dedicated national policy record for autonomous AI-agent systems.
The consequence statement is limited to what the linked evidence and event record support.
Supporting passages
FactExact quotes below are taken from evidence rows attached to this update.
- China’s agent guidance links development to lifecycle governance. The guidance defines agents by autonomous capabilities and places safety requirements across research, deployment and promotion.
- China’s agent guidance defines AI agents by five capabilities. The opinions define an AI agent as an intelligent system with autonomous perception, memory, decision, interaction and execution capabilities.
- China’s agent guidance keeps final decision rights with users. Item 6 requires that users retain informed consent and final decision rights over agent autonomous decisions, and that agent actions stay inside user authorisation.
- China’s agent guidance sets classified and graded governance. Item 11 directs cyberspace and sector authorities to set open scenes in sensitive and key industries, with filing, testing and problem-product recall measures under applicable law and standards.
坚持安全可控,将智能体安全、可靠、可信作为发展的底线要求,贯穿智能体技术研发、应用部署与推广的全过程,切实防范系统性风险。
智能体是具备自主感知、记忆、决策、交互与执行能力的智能系统,是人工智能产品及服务的重要形态。
确保用户对智能体自主决策享有知情权和最终决策权,智能体执行操作不得超出用户授权范围。
对于敏感领域及重点行业,由网信部门联合行业主管部门确定开放场景,根据相关法律法规、监管要求和安全防护标准,实行备案、检测、问题产品召回等管理措施。
Limits
LimitsThe document is policy guidance. Subsequent binding rules and technical standards determine concrete compliance duties.
An update page records a dated change. It does not replace the full vehicle text or later amendments.