Canonical policy question · Content integrity

Should AI-generated content be labelled?

Governments require disclosure in different forms. Technical duties, responsible actors and enforcement models still diverge.

Current statefragmenting

Policy asks

Tracked outcomes

Policy vehicles

Where the asks appear

Policy lineage

Events and deadlines
  1. 2025-03-14
    China publishes synthetic-content labelling measures

    Four authorities published measures governing labels for AI-generated synthetic content.

  2. 2025-09-01
    China’s synthetic-content labelling measures take effect

    The national labelling measures entered into force.

  3. 2026-01-22
    Korea AI Basic Act enters into force

    The AI Basic Act and Enforcement Decree took effect, with a grace period of at least one year.

  4. 2026-08-02
    EU Article 50 transparency duties enter application

    The EU’s Article 50 transparency duties became applicable as enforcement powers expanded.

  5. 2026-12-02
    Limited Article 50 legacy-system grace period ends

    The limited transition for machine-readable marking by certain systems placed on the market before August closes.

Evidence ledger

Explained source passages

Article 50 transparency duties entered into application

The Commission states that Article 50 applies from 2 August 2026.

Article 50 of the AI Act applies as from 2 August 2026.
European Commission · Commission FAQ · application date

EU rules require detectable machine-readable marks

The Commission describes a technical marking duty for covered AI-generated or altered content.

AI-generated or altered content will also have to carry machine-readable marks so it can be detected more easily.
European Commission · Commission enforcement announcement · paragraph 3

China’s synthetic-content labelling measures entered into force

Article 14 sets 1 September 2025 as the effective date.

第十四条 本办法自2025年9月1日起施行。
Cyberspace Administration of China · Article 14
Cross-source analysisOpen evidence record

EU and Chinese rules converge on provider-side labelling

Both regimes impose provider-facing duties, although their legal scope and enforcement structure differ.

服务提供者开展人工智能生成合成内容标识活动,适用本办法。
Cyberspace Administration of China · China measures · Article 2, read with EU Article 50 material

Korea’s AI Basic Act took effect on 22 January 2026

MSIT states the AI Basic Act and Enforcement Decree come into force on 22 January 2026.

The Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister: Bae Kyung-hoon) announced that the Basic Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and the Establishment of a Trustworthy Foundation (“AI Basic Act”) comes into effect on January 22.
Ministry of Science and ICT (Korea) · MSIT press release · lead

Korea’s Enforcement Decree requires clear labelling of generative AI outputs

MSIT describes Enforcement Decree Article 23 duties to inform users and clearly label generative AI outputs, including deepfakes.

For outputs generated by generative AI, including AI-manipulated content (deepfakes) that may raise social concerns, the decree requires clear labeling in a manner that can be easily recognized by users, taking into account factors such as age.
Ministry of Science and ICT (Korea) · MSIT press release · Enforcement Decree key feature ⑥ Obligation to Ensure Transparency (Article 23)

Intelligence records

Reported developments